Political bargaining with the truth
Posted by: Susan Marshall | Posted in: Living Intentionally, Social/political Activism, Susan's MusingsMonday, September 29, 2008
You can’t bargain with the truth. Whether you’re old or young, we’re going to see what you’ve done. There’ll be nowhere else to run in the end.You can’t bargain with the truth. ‘Cause whether you’re rich or you’re poor, you’re going to meet at the same door; you’re going to know the real score in the end.And if you want to help your fellow man, you better start with what is in your hand.
Drill, baby, drill!
I must have way too much time on my hands.
The evidence? I’m watching an inordinate number of political news shows. As a result, in the past month I’ve variously experienced cautious optimism, raw disgust, anger, “you got to be kidding me!” exclamations, and downright concern about the intelligence of our nation. My husband declares that the whole political system should be revamped. After all, eighteen-plus months is just too long to elect a president.
OK, fair warning….if you haven’t already guessed, this is a rant.
![]()
Honesty is such a lonely word. |
You could argue that scurrilous, untrue and dishonest advertisements are just part of the game.
But why does it have to be that way? How does a campaign—and for that matter, the candidate—feel good with itself when it misrepresents the facts? Obama wanted to provide sex education to kindergartners?? Get a grip. Obama wants to raise your taxes…yeah, if you are in the top 1% annual income bracket. It goes on and on and on. And even sadder, Obama has been pressed to respond in kind. What happened to the two candidates who declared that this election would occur on a higher plane?
But what frustrates me the most is that people—voters—don’t bother to check out the facts contained in those ads or in the ridiculous emails that travel the Internet at warp speed. People read them and think, “Geez, Obama’s a Muslim! Did you know that he was sworn in on a Koran?”
Just because it was in an email – does that make it true? Why not check out the facts? Don’t trust potentially partisan sources? Then go to http://www.factcheck.org/, www.snopes.com, or www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter. The Democrats and Barack Obama are not totally clean either, but to me the Republicans have been totally irresponsible. Their motto? The best defense is offense.
And when does repeating and repeating something (like claiming you were against the Bridge to Nowhere) make it a reality when all the facts say otherwise?
One last shout-out: those of you who say you can’t possibly vote for Obama because he doesn’t put his hand over his heart during the national anthem, please admit the truth. You plan not to vote for him because you don’t agree with his proposed policies—equal pay for women, affordable health care for all, doing nation building here rather than in Iraq, among others—or you just can’t see voting for a Democrat under any circumstances. I can accept those reasons (well, kind of), but please don’t use phony excuses.
Mr. Greed, why you got to own everything that you see? |
Gimme, gimme, gimme. It seems we want it all. The current financial crisis is just the latest—and most stratospheric—example of greed and irresponsibility. Finally we have proof that Gordon Gekko, in the film Wall Street, was wrong when he said “Greed is good.”
Right now it feels more like the 2007 film, “There Will Be Blood.”
Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and AIG. As I’m writing this, it’s certain more institutions will join the list. Their CEOs walk or are sent away with millions and the American taxpayer is saddled with an historic $700 billion pile of poop. Many say that unregulated markets are supposed to be free to fail or to heal themselves; others remind us that our financial inner workings are so complex and fundamental to our nation’s health that we have to do something.
I know I don’t understand it all. Do you? With all the slicing and dicing that went on with sub-prime mortgages, how can anyone sufficiently wrap their arms around the extent of the problem? The 3-page Paulson bailout “plan” will no doubt be picked apart by every possible senator and representative—and rightly so. Let’s hope that any bailout plan includes no golden parachutes, as much help for Main Street as there is for Wall Street, and strict bipartisan oversight.
And what about those individuals facing foreclosures because they were tricked into signing on the bottom line of mortgages they didn’t understand and certainly couldn’t afford? Yes, there should be personal accountability and someone making $50,000 shouldn’t be buying a $750,000 house. But shouldn’t the lender prevent that from happening when they see the borrower’s financial statement? If they ask for it.
In our society, everyone wants what they want and they want it NOW. Consider the 20 year-old who’s making $22,000 and really wants that big screen TV. He can’t afford it, so he charges it. It’s not surprising, then, that collectively, we share 2.6 trillion dollars of consumer debt. (And note that consumer debt does not include debt secured by real estate.) Another depressing statistic: our nation has the lowest level of savings of any developed nation.
And don’t get me going about the political pandering to the “me me me” constituency. Gas tax holiday? Gimme me a break. Rather than getting behind an energy plan that will make us energy independent in ten years, we want an extra $30 a month in our pockets.
Admit it—sacrifice is not in our vocabulary.
Drill here, drill now….even when it won’t lower our gasoline prices any time in the next decade and doesn’t do a single thing to aid our energy independence, let alone move the needle on climate change.
The fact that Democrats have decided to allow a quarter-century ban on drilling for oil off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to expire—thus conceding defeat in a months-long battle with the White House and Republicans—makes my stomach knot up.
When will we ever get serious about clean and renewable energy?
Although your mind’s opaque |
I’m stunned by the number of people who have decided to vote for McCain-Palin because “she is like me.” What is that all about? It’s similar thinking about having a beer with Bush that got us the mess of the last eight years.
If you didn’t see it, read Jane’s blog, Freedom to Choose. She’s lays it on the line with regard to Sarah Palin.
I want a President that’s smarter than me, not someone who knows how to dress a moose. Someone not prone to rash decision making, a person who’s curious, thinks deeply, considers diverging views and turns a difficult topic into pure inspiration. What’s wrong with great oratory style and a desire to make us better than we already are?
Fortunately, as each interview is conducted with Palin, she is revealed as the lightweight she really is. I think I have more foreign policy experience from my world travels than she does from being able to see Russia from her house! And now there are rumors that the Republicans are trying to have the Vice Presidential debate delayed. Hmmm, wonder why?
I’m going to need a long nap after November 4.
![]()
I’m fortunate that my lane change has resulted in me having the time and energy to get engaged....by being more connected with my community and by becoming an informed participant in our country’s political process.
What are you trying to accomplish with your lane change? How do you feel about the election this year?
Shout out!
Comments
truth in election. We can only dream
Posted by on 10/04 at 04:14 PMI decided to vote for McCain because I can’t believe anything that comes from Obama. Did he not really know Ayers, not know he had been involved in bombing American targets, or think he was rehabilitated? Does he really think the republicans deregulated banking and not realize that Carter enacted the Community Reinvestment Act and deregulated the banks. Do you not know that Clinton pressured banks to loan money to high risk people who would not be able to pay it back. Do you not know that John McCain warned the Senate in 2005 of the impending crisis if control over banks was on taken. Do you not know that Barney Franks stated at that time that Fannie Mae was “sound?” Do you not know that Sen Dodd, Sen Obama, and John Kerry were the top 3 recipients of donations from the floundering Fannie Mae? Do you not know that $250,000 a year is not wealthy in many areas of the country? Do you think that because Sarah Palin can “dress a moose” does NOT mean you are smarter than she. How elitest can you be? You need to do some research and get over your obviously overinflated opinion of you intellegence.
Posted by on 10/22 at 10:25 AMNancy, it’s too bad that you are so sour on Obama. I guess we could go tit-for-tat long past Election Day on all the issues, so let me answer briefly. It’s easy to understand that you may hold a different view regarding Ayers, but it’s clear that that many people, both Democrat and Republican, consider him rehabilitated. He sat on a foundation board with Obama, along with many prominent citizens from both parties. I offer no opinion on the topic.
I certainly agree—and I’ve heard Obama state—that this mess we are in is the result of collective bi-partisan actions. We’re all have our hands dirty. So, I’m not sure what Presidents Carter’s and Clinton’s actions really suggest regarding Obama’s campaign. I do know that McCain is a longtime deregulator, by his own admission—but is calling for more regulation just as Obama is. I’m not sure what all the other facts have to do with who’s the sounder Presidential choice, McCain or Obama. Given all the money McCain has received from lobbyists, it’s probably not wise to go toe to toe on who gets the most donations from lobbyists. After all, McCain’s sizable number of contributions from lobbyists is only outnumbered by those working in the financial services industry. Additionally, McCain has drawn significant scrutiny for the number of lobbyists who run his campaign.
And, Nancy, I don’t know if $250,000 really makes anyone wealthy. I do know that earning that much or more puts you in the top 2 percent of all households. Wealth is subjective.
You might be right—Sarah Palin indeed may be smarter than me, but I do know the role of the Vice President...and it isn’t running the Senate and creating legislation. She’s certainly braver and more comfortable in front of millions of people than I am….but she’s still not ready to be Vice-President and that’s my point. As many conservatives have concluded and as many interviews have proven, she’s not informed, nor does she think deeply or analytically. Rather, she has a warped worldview that she delivers with polarizing adeptness. Not my cup of tea.
Glad to see you’re engaged in the political process this year!
Posted by on 10/22 at 02:18 PM